Peat bags
 
Peatland

Issues

Peat Milling

In recent years milling has become the dominant technique for large-scale peat extraction across Europe. Peat milling is unsustainable, destroying the biological, archaeological and landscape value of peatland. It is essential to increase the use of peat alternatives and decrease the amount of peat we use in our gardens.

The milling process

Before milling, the bog is extensively drained. This may take years, as it involves progressively increasing the depths of the drains to avoid collapse and support the weight of the milling machines.

When the bog is fully drained all the vegetation is removed and the ground is levelled. The top 15mm is then milled to produce a powdered peat that is left to dry. The milled peat is turned several times using a harrow to assist the drying process. When the peat is dry enough, it is gathered into ridges for a large vacuum harvester to collect.

Peat milling   Harvester emptying load
Peat milling. Click here to view detailed image.   Harvester emptying load. Click here for detailed image.

Depending on weather conditions, there may be as many as 12 harvests of peat in a year, removing a depth of up to 200mm of peat. Since it takes approximately 1 year for 1mm of peat to form, this represents 200 years' worth of peat removed every year.

Peatbags
Peat bags

The horticultural use of peat

Milled peat is used in a variety of industries. For example, every year the Republic of Ireland uses over 12 million m3 of milled peat to produce electricity, and a further 1 million m3 to make peat briquettes. However, the main use of milled peat is in the horticultural industry, as a soil improver and growing medium for container plants.

In 2001, the United Kingdom used 5.4 million m3 of growing media and soil improver:

  • 63% of this was peat
  • 37% was alternative such as bark, coir and green compost

More than half of the peat the UK uses is imported from other countries, particularly the Republic of Ireland and the Baltic states (see Table 1 below).

Table 1. Sources of peat supplied to all horticultural markets in the United Kingdom in 2001

Source

Growing media
(m3)

Soil improvers
(m3)

Total
(m3)

%

United Kingdom

1,486,000

36,000

1,522,000

45%

Republic of Ireland

1,422,000

59,000

1,481,000

44%

Baltic States

375,000

17,100

392,100

11%

Total

3,283,000

112,100

3,395,100

100%

We can divide peat users in the horticultural industry into four groups:

  • amateur gardeners
  • professional growers
  • local authorities
  • landscape contractors

Amateur gardeners use approximately two thirds while professional growers accounting for only around one third of the peat used. Local authorities and landscape contractors use only a very small proportion of peat.

Milled peat usage by the horticultural industry in the United Kingdom in 2001. Click here to view detailed image.

Amateur gardeners

Gardening is a very popular leisure activity with all social groups and ages. Approximately 85% of people in the UK have access to a garden and in recent years there have been significant increases in sales of all gardening materials. A large increase peat consumption between 1993 and 1996, from 1.55 million m3 to 2.27 million m3, was largely due to the increased use of growing media for container and patio gardening.

Peat alternatives
Peat alternatives. Click here to view detailed image.

Amateur gardeners usually buy peat-based growing media in ready-to-use bags, and many may be unaware of the adverse effects of milling on peatland habitats. Encouragingly, there has been a large growth in the use of peat alternatives by amateur gardeners in recent years.

However, this has not reduced the amount of peat being used. The total amount of materials amateur gardeners use continues to rise, so the increased use of alternatives has simply allowed the amount of peat used to remain fairly constant.

Professional growers

Milled peat is important for the professional grower as it has a proven performance and consistency, good availability and is competitively priced.

Traditionally the use of peat alternatives with professional growers has been relatively low due to the quality requirements and economic implications if products do not meet existing standards. The main alternatives were once just by-products from forestry and agriculture, such as bark, wood waste and cocoa shells. Green compost was unpopular because of concerns regarding its variability, pathogens and nutrient levels. Recent research and development has done much to overcome these problems. In 2001 green compost accounted for 16% of peat alternatives used in the UK, but this is likely to increase substantially because of current recycling policies.

Since 1999 two major factors have contributed to the increased amount of peat alternatives professional growers use:

  • The quality, standard and availability of peat alternatives has improved greatly.
  • Major retailers are insisting that growers supply plants grown in 'reduced peat' or peat free media.

Retailers are undoubtedly responding to factors such as increased public concern about conserving peatland habitats, lobbying from conservation organisations and the Government's increasing emphasis on the sustainable use of resources. Further developments in waste management policy may produce recycled wastes with the potential to substantially reduce peat use in horticultural markets.

  Forestry Turf/peat cutting Top
Environment and Heritage Service logo